Skip to main content
Actualyze AI LogoActualyze AI Logo
Use case · Secure AI Usage

Make every AI call a safe one.

PII and secret masking, controls on the tool calls agents make, and per-team data rules run inline on every request, before it reaches a model, in the path your teams already use. No additional reviews, no separate scanner, no policy that only exists on paper.

guardrails · inline scanSCANNING
Guardrails: monitor and enforce across the workspace
The problem

Prompts are the new exfiltration route.

Today, nothing stands between your data and the model provider. Every prompt can carry PII, credentials, and source code out of your perimeter.

Sensitive data in prompts

Customer records, API keys, and proprietary code get pasted into prompts every day. Once a request leaves, there's no recalling what it carried.

Policy without enforcement

The AI usage policy lives in docs. No runtime checks it, no log proves it was followed, and every violation is discovered after the fact, if ever.

Safety rebuilt per app

Each team wires its own redaction and filtering - differently, partially, or not at all - so your real security posture is whatever the last app shipped.

Why it matters now

AI safety has to live in the request path, not in app code.

Models are now in every workflow: support desks, coding assistants, agents acting on their own. The surface area grows faster than any per-app safety effort can cover.

A single pasted secret or customer record is a reportable incident. Controls that depend on developers remembering to call the right library will eventually miss one.

When safety is enforced in the path every call already takes, it applies to every team, every app, and every agent at once, and produces its own evidence.

The solution

Guardrails enforced inline, on every call.

Route model traffic through one governed plane where every prompt, response, and tool call is scanned the moment it happens, with every decision recorded.

Scan and redact before anything leaves.

PII and secret masking runs inline on the prompt before it reaches the model, and again on the response. Tool-call controls check what an agent tries to do with a tool, so an injected prompt can't use one to move data out. Every detection is recorded, never silently dropped.

  • PII, secret, and credential masking
  • Tool allowlists, URL filtering, and parameter scanning
  • Request and response scanned inline
Guardrails: monitor and enforce across the workspace

Data rules that follow your org.

Data rules travel with the team, not the app. Who can send what to which model is decided once, centrally with no per-app policy wiring to drift out of date.

  • SSO through your identity provider (SAML)
  • Per-team, per-model data rules
  • Only allowed MCP tool calls go through
Approvals queue: pending team, deployment, and budget requests

Every decision on the record.

Each detection and each blocked tool call is written to an append-only audit trail, with a snapshot of the guardrail configuration in force at that moment. Safety stops being a claim and becomes something you can look up.

  • Detections recorded with the guardrail that fired
  • Append-only trail, never rewritten
  • Filter by actor, action, status, and time
Audit logs: every action with actor, status, and flags
FAQ

Questions about securing AI usage.

What actually gets caught before a request reaches the model?
PII, secrets, and credentials are masked inline before the request leaves, and responses are scanned the same way on the way back. Agent tool calls are checked too: which tools the team may invoke, where a call's parameters point, and what the tool returns. An injected prompt can't use a tool to move data out. Guardrails are built to protect data, and they don't judge what a conversation is about.
Do developers have to change their code to get this?
No. Guardrails run in the request path, so any app calling through the platform is covered automatically. Teams keep their existing OpenAI-compatible SDK calls. Safety applies whether or not the app did anything about it.
Can different teams have different rules?
Yes. Teams add their own guardrails per model on top of the workspace floor, which no team can weaken. Teams can be imported from the directory groups in your SSO identity provider (SAML).
What happens when a guardrail fires?
In enforce mode, the sensitive value is masked before the model sees it, and a risky tool call is blocked before it runs. In monitor mode, the detection is logged and the call goes through. Either way it's recorded with the guardrail configuration in force at that moment, so you can see what fired, why, and which team it came from.
How is this different from asking teams to use a redaction library?
A library is a convention; Actualyze is a control. Enforcement in the request path applies to every app and agent uniformly, can't be forgotten, and writes its own evidence trail as it works.
Does adding scanning slow teams down?
Guardrails run inline in the path teams already use, replacing the manual review lap that used to gate every AI launch. Security applies automatically instead of becoming a ticket.

Safe by default, on every call.

Put masking, tool-call controls, and per-team data rules in the request path, and get the record that proves they ran.