Actualyze vs LiteLLM
Actualyze. The whole package for governing AI, with masking from the first request and no unknown cost as $0.
LiteLLM is an AI gateway that puts many providers behind one API, and Actualyze is the AI gateway and AI governance platform for the enterprise. On top of the gateway, Actualyze gives each model its own approver and finance a month it can close.
Competitor facts checked against LiteLLM's documentation on .
In short
- Actualyze. FinOps sees every unpriced call while the gap is small. LiteLLM records $0 spend for a model its cost map doesn't list.
- Actualyze. Every new workspace masks personal data in prompts and responses. LiteLLM runs a guardrail once it is defined and attached or set default_on.
- Actualyze. A model request and a budget request reach two different owners. LiteLLM proxy admins grant model groups and set budgets.
Actualyze
Your organization
policy from Team Owners and Budget Managers
Inference
- public APIs
- brokers
- GPU clouds
- your own servers
LiteLLM
LiteLLM proxy
policy from virtual key settings
Inference
- supported providers
- OpenAI-compatible endpoints
- your servers, such as vLLM
Side by side
LiteLLM is an AI gateway that gives applications one OpenAI-compatible API to many model providers. LiteLLM gives each caller a virtual key that carries the caller's models, budgets, and rate limits.
| Actualyze | LiteLLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and routing | ||
| Where cost figures come from | Priced per model and provider. Unknown cost is never $0 | LiteLLM's model cost map, with overrides per deployment A deployment is one model at one provider, and any price in the map can be set on it. |
| One model, many providers | One model through any provider the caller can use | Deployments that share a model name are load-balanced LiteLLM calls them a model group and grants access to the group as a whole. |
| Routing across models | Sizes each request, picks the cheapest model strong enough A Virtual Model, one name over several models, picks only among models the caller can already use. | A beta Auto Router scores each request into a tier Each tier names one model or a pool of models, from simple to reasoning. |
| Provider prompt caches | Stays on the cached model unless moving saves money | Opt-in sticky sessions keep a conversation on one deployment LiteLLM suggests them where deployments don't share state, such as a provider's prompt cache. |
| Access and spend | ||
| Who approves access and spend | Each model names its own approver. Budget Managers own spend | Proxy admins grant model groups and set budgets Enterprise team admins can lower or raise a team's budget only where a proxy admin allows. |
| Budgets and limits | Budgets nest. A call past the limit is rejected | Budgets on keys, users, teams, and team members LiteLLM checks each request against its budgets before calling the provider. |
| Chargeback and the month | Finance closes the month on one statement | Daily spend by model, provider, and API key |
| Protection | ||
| On from the first request | Personal data masked from the first request The default guardrail masks personal data in prompts and responses, and nobody can delete it. | Nothing is scanned until a guardrail is defined A guardrail marked default_on then runs on every request. |
| Weakening protection | Protection can't be quietly switched off | Enterprise admins can stop teams toggling guardrails LiteLLM documents no written reason or alert when a guardrail is weakened. |
| Records and reach | ||
| Audit record | Each routed call records which model answered and why The record can't be edited, and it names the model the app asked for. | Spend logs name the model group and serving deployment |
| What the controls reach | Any LLM, anywhere, behind an OpenAI- or Anthropic-style API Your own servers too, through a relay you run that only connects outward. | Supported providers and OpenAI-compatible endpoints |
| Bringing a model online | Each model goes live only after its own approval | Admins add and test models in the UI or API Test Connection checks a model against its provider with the stored credentials. |
| Deployment | ||
| Deployment | Hosted today. On-prem deployment coming in 2027 | Self-hosted on AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, or Kubernetes |
Actualyze. Priced at what you really pay, down to the call.
Actualyze
modelnew-model-preview
througha GPU cloud
tokens1.4M
cost
unknown, not $0
statusserved, and flagged to FinOps
Actualyze serves it from day one and never books it as $0.
LiteLLM
modelnew-model-preview
througha GPU cloud
tokens1.4M
cost
$0.00
logThis model isn't mapped yet
LiteLLM records $0 spend for a model it hasn't mapped.
Actualyze flags every unpriced call, because an unknown cost is never $0.
When a team starts on a model with no published price, Actualyze serves the call, keeps its token count, and marks the cost unpriced for your FinOps team to see. Confirm a rate, such as one you negotiated, and Actualyze prices every call with it from then on. No gap ever passes for a free model.
LiteLLM prices each deployment from its model cost map.
In LiteLLM, a deployment is one model at one provider, and a deployment can override the map's prices. A percentage discount per provider covers negotiated rates. A model missing from the map logs a warning and records $0 spend.
Actualyze. Personal data is masked from the first request.
Actualyze
- workspace createdthe default guardrail is already on
first request
Reply to [REDACTED:EMAIL_ADDRESSES]
Actualyze masks the email from the first request.
LiteLLM
- a PII guardrail is definedPresidio, in config.yaml
- default_on is set to trueor it is attached to keys or teams
each request
Presidio masks or blocks the PII
LiteLLM scans nothing until a guardrail is defined.
Actualyze protects personal data on day one, before anyone writes a policy.
Every Actualyze workspace is created with masking already on, for prompts on the way out and responses on the way back. The customer's email in that first-day prompt is masked before the provider sees it. The default guardrail can't be deleted, and pausing it means writing down why, with every Workspace Admin notified. Actualyze gives every workspace the safest starting point in AI governance.
LiteLLM scans nothing until a guardrail is defined.
A LiteLLM guardrail set to default_on runs on every request. Otherwise a guardrail runs only where it is attached to a key, a team, or a request. LiteLLM's Presidio guardrail masks or blocks PII in the request.
Actualyze. The best model routing in the field.
Actualyze
- Model A$0.15 / Mnot strong enough
- Model B$0.60 / Mstrong enough
- Model C$3.00 / Mstrong enough
- OpenAI
- Azure
- Anthropicstandby
- Bedrockserving
- Vertexstandby
Actualyze answers with the cheapest model strong enough.
LiteLLM
- Model Asimple
- Model Bmedium, load-balanced
- Model Ccomplex
- OpenAI
- Anthropic
- Bedrock
- Anthropic
LiteLLM returns the answer from that tier's model.
Actualyze sends each request to a model strong enough for it, with no tiers to map.
An Actualyze Virtual Model is one name for several models. There are no tier rules to write and no classifier to pick, because Actualyze brings a routing model of its own, trained to judge what each request needs. Each model you place behind the name is served over all the provider routes you connect, with standby routes ready when one fails.
LiteLLM's Auto Router scores each request into a tier.
LiteLLM's beta Auto Router classifies each request with a heuristic scorer, an LLM call, JEV, or a plugin, then sends it to the model or pool set for that tier. A tier's model name can spread across several deployments, and LiteLLM falls back to another model when a call fails.
Six questions every AI gateway should answer live
If your AI gateway can't tell you who approved a model or what last month cost each team, it's just moving traffic. Put these questions to every vendor on your list, and ask to see each answer working in the product. Actualyze answers every one today, and each comes with a check you can run in your own trial.
Who approves a team's access to each model?
The leading delegation and approval system for AI spend starts here. In Actualyze, each model names its own approver.
Request a model that needs approval as a team member, and check who receives the request and where the decision is recorded.
What decides which model answers each request?
In Actualyze, a routing model we train sizes each request and picks the cheapest model strong enough, the best model routing in the field.
Send an easy question and a hard one to one Virtual Model, then see which model each was routed to, and why.
What happens to a call when its budget runs out?
Actualyze rejects it before any model is contacted, so a budget is a real limit and never a surprise on the bill.
Set a small test budget and confirm the next request is rejected once it reaches its limit.
Does an unknown cost ever show up as $0?
An unknown cost is never $0 in Actualyze, which marks it unpriced and flags it for FinOps, so no spend hides behind a zero.
Connect a third-party endpoint with no catalog price, call it, and check the call reads unpriced, not $0.
What is protected before anyone writes a policy?
Personal data is masked from the first request in Actualyze, in prompts and responses, by a default guardrail nobody can delete.
Open a new workspace's guardrails before writing any policy, and confirm the default guardrail is already enforcing.
Can finance close the month on AI spend?
Finance closes the month on AI spend with one Actualyze statement, a row for each budget, reviewed and then settled.
Generate a statement for a month with traffic, then move it from draft to reviewed to settled.
Common questions
What is the difference between Actualyze and LiteLLM?
Does Actualyze route for cost as well as quality?
How do applications move from LiteLLM to Actualyze?
Sources
24 pages, checked
- LiteLLM custom model cost map
- LiteLLM model access guide
- LiteLLM Auto Routing (beta)
- LiteLLM router, routing groups, and session affinity
- LiteLLM role-based access control
- LiteLLM budgets and rate limits
- LiteLLM spend tracking
- LiteLLM security and the OWASP LLM Top 10
- LiteLLM guardrails quick start
- LiteLLM OpenAI-compatible endpoints
- LiteLLM model management
- LiteLLM production deployment
- LiteLLM getting started
- LiteLLM AI Gateway overview
- LiteLLM Enterprise
- LiteLLM fallbacks
- LiteLLM troubleshooting for an unmapped model
- LiteLLM provider discounts
- LiteLLM vLLM provider
- Actualyze access, budgets, approvals, and cost accounting
- Actualyze guardrails and audit
- Actualyze Virtual Models and routing
- Actualyze endpoints and integrations
- Actualyze pricing
LiteLLM and the other product names on this page are trademarks of their owners. Actualyze is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.
More comparisons
Actualyze vs TrueFoundry
Actualyze. Every model and every budget gets its own approver, and finance closes the month on one statement.
Actualyze vs Portkey
Actualyze. Personal data masked from the first request, inside the most complete AI governance platform.
Actualyze vs Kong AI Gateway
Actualyze. Approvals that scale to thousands of people, and personal data masked from the first request.
Actualyze and OpenRouter
Actualyze. Govern AI wherever you buy inference. Keep OpenRouter as one source among many.
Actualyze and Vercel AI Gateway
Actualyze. Keep Vercel AI Gateway. Governance shouldn't depend on whose inference you buy.
Actualyze and Cloudflare AI Gateway
Actualyze. Keep Cloudflare AI Gateway, and give every AI dollar an owner from day one.
Give every model an approver and every call a budget.
Connect the providers you already use and test every claim on this page against your own traffic. Or book a demo. We'll walk you through it, and send the Virtual Model engine whitepaper if routing is on your list.